Every teacher is involved in the complex business of fostering high aspirations in our learners. Finding a practical way to do this through the learning that we design and how we deliver it can be incredibly challenging. It is true to say that to do so would constitute far more than a Marginal Learning Gain as if we are able to find a way to establish a highly aspirational culture in our lessons, then this has the potential to pervade whole-school culture. As always, striving for an aspirational culture, the Marginal Learning Gains can be found nestled deep inside what is meant by ‘aspiration’.
What is really worth focusing on is ‘expectations’. It’s a mindset thing. The MLG here is characterised by the mindset of the teacher and how this is communicated through the design and delivery of learning experiences. It comes down to a (tiny) change in our language and, as a result, the language of our learners.
Here’s where the concept of ‘expectation-language’ first originated as MLG was developing…(taken from http://www.fullonlearning.com)
“How ‘hopeful’ was Dave Brailsford on the morning of the first leg of The Tour De France or on the morning of the first cycling competitions in London 2012? Did he hope that Bradley Wiggins would win or did he expect it? Did he hope that Team GB Cycling would reach their targets on the medal tables or did he expect it? More to the point, did he and his team communicate an expectation of success to the riders, or simply pat them on the back as they cruised to the start line and then say that they hoped they would win?
This got me thinking about the relationship between thinking and speaking. The language in our heads and the language we use to communicate. “
Often, when planning lessons together, teachers state that they hope that the students will get to the (x) task. When reflecting on lessons, teachers often say that they had hoped that the group would have achieved (x).
Some enquiry questions may help here:
- How do we establish a culture of aspirational learning through the language of learning in which we think and speak?
- What practical strategies can I implement to establish a culture of aspirational learning?
- How can we deliberately develop learner aspirations through our own mindset and language?
- How will we know when it’s working?
- What language do I think in?
The final question here is the one to hone in on as a first MLG opportunity.
When you are thinking about the lessons you are going to teach, rather than thinking in terms of ‘hope‘ the MLG comes when you start thinking in terms of what you expect. In thinking and talking in highly aspirational ways and trying really hard to avoid using the word ‘hope’ and with it, ‘might’ and ‘should’, I am in no ways advocating ‘hopeless‘ teaching or, indeed, a strict, no-compromise rigid and inflexible all-or-nothing succeed-or-fail approach to teaching and learning. But the Marginal Learning Gain in employing an expectant mindset means that our lesson design is influenced by some real ambition and aspiration for our students and start to sound like this:
What do I hope students will be able to do as a result of this lesson?
What do I expect students to be able to do as a result of the lesson?
When we ask students to set their own goals ahead of the lesson, we can, using the same language, require them to frame their thinking and goal-setting in the language of expectations so that students agree / write / feedback:
- “I expect to complete…”
- “I expect to achieve….”
- “I expect to be able to…”
When we assess whether students have achieved their goals and ask them to reflect on their own progress, we can ask them to use the same language as a prefix to stating what they actually achieved:
I expected to have completed / achieved / to be able to…and I did / didn’t quite/ didn’t…because…
Another expectant-language MLG by changing “I can” statements into “I will” statements. These can be used either as a replacement:
As a result of today’s lesson, I can….
As a result of today’s lesson, I will….
Or as an addition:
As a result of today’s lesson (Learning Outcome) I can……………so that I will………………
A highly aspirational learning culture will be characterised by the typical and frequent use of just this expectant language, shared by teachers and students alike. So we think it first, use it in our learning outcomes, lesson design and conversations with students. They, in turn, use the same language. They are specific in what they want to achieve, they set their own goals and they expect to achieve them. When they do achieve them, they are able to provide evidence for how this was done and If for some reason they do not achieve these goals, they are immediately prompted to ask why not and what steps they WILL take to meet their next goal.
Mindset Shift: Hopeful Teaching to Expectant Teaching
Moving from a hopeful to expectant teaching mindset has a direct impact on how we structure learning. If we expect certain things to happen, we need to be really clear about why, how and when this will happen. When we pose questions or set up discussions, the following change occurs:
‘I hope they come up with some good responses’
‘I expect them to generate high quality, well thought-out and considered responses’
The language of expectancy starts to take on the following format: Structured, Specific and Succinct or S3 for short.
Here’s an example:
You are going to complete this activity in three parts:
First, I am going to ask you to look at an image on your own and think about it for 1 minute.
Second, you will have 2 minutes to discuss your thinking with your partner and together, write down 3 possible responses to the image.
Third and last, still with your partner, you will both have just 30 seconds to agree your BEST THINKING in response to this image.
The impact of using the language of expectations
- Every student thinks more deeply about the task at hand because they know they have to generate a specific number of initial ideas within a structured time frame (AGENCY)
- Every student will engage in the decision-making process (rather than just going with the first / loudest / most confident / forceful idea) because they are specifically required to justify the selection that they made (AUTONOMY)
- Every student feels safe to contribute because they are specifically asked to use their ‘best thinking’ not come up with the right or best answer (AFFILIATION)
In being explicit about expectations, we can frame success criteria in a far more purposeful and succinct way. If we want a group to come up with some good questions about a topic, we can start to think about how many questions we realistically, or ambitiously, expect them to come up with. Then we can specifically tell them how many questions we really expect them to generate. If we think they will need about three minutes to do this, we can tell them we expect them to come up with (x number) of questions in (x amount) of time. In this way, we will can be clear about our expectations and communicate our belief in their ability to achieve this at the same time, SO THAT we nurture their personal sense of agency and a ‘can do’ attitude in learning.
So, “I want you to come up with some ideas” becomes, “I expect each one of you (insert names if needed) to identify six important points in the text and select the three most important in (specific time)”
And, “Some of you might be able to/ could/ should….” becomes, “I expect those of you who are working at level (x) / (insert names if needed) to be able to…by (midway point in the lesson/ end of lesson/)…SO THAT….you can show me/ each other that you can/ understand/ know/…’
Marginal Learning Gain #5 pt 2 = Communicating in the Language of Expectations (S3)
- Think in the language of expectations SO THAT we communicate what we expectlearners to be able to achieve by the mid-point/ end of the lesson/ topic/ unit/ term
- Design and organise learning SO THAT we ensure learners meet both our own and their own expectations (as far as they possibly can)
- Communicate through the language of expectations SO THAT learning outcomes are framed as; “I expect (either insert names OR use all/ most/ some of you) to be able to (do/ show/ analyse/ communicate/ create etc) SO THAT …”
- Encourage learners to adopt the language of expectancy in their own thinking (structured, specific and succinct) SO THAT they start to shape and own their ambition
- Ask learners what they specifically expect to be able to do/ know/ understand achieve and how they will do this at specific points in the lesson SO THAT they can commit to just this (see Marginal Gains #2 Compliance to learning plan)
- Ask learners what they expect from the next lesson based on what they can now do and/or what they now know and understand SO THAT they build on prior learning and engage in their own sense of progression over time
- Ask learners how well they expect to achieve in a forthcoming assessment, by the end of the topic, term, year SO THAT they can record this and use it as their personal learning goals as the year progresses
When we are expectant of ourselves and each other, surely then, we will find ourselves enjoying a culture of high aspirations? And if, for some reason, expectations are not met, then I wonder whether enables us to ask exclusively learning-focused questions as to why this hasn’t happened. In this way, we can avoid being left wondering whether a failure to meet a learning goal was because we did not explain the task with clarity, plan it well enough or think it through. We will surely know that, having adopted the ‘Expectant Teaching Mindset’, we certainly made it clear, we definitely planned it well and we meticulously thought it through, then the next obvious step is to respond to the missed goal as being down to a gap in knowledge, understanding or skill development. We can then immediately and confidently adjust our teaching accordingly.
The Line of Engagement
Reflecting on to what degree pupils are engaging in their own learning and what this looks like, rather than whether they just simply, ‘are or are not engaged’ is another important dimension of the mindset of expectant teaching that you may wish to develop.
Here are some reflective and observational questions to hold in your head when the lesson is underway that you can use as part of your Marginal Learning Gains micro-action research:
QUESTION: Who is at what level of engagement for a SPECIFIC phase of the lesson?
(1) PARTICIPATING: Those who are simply ‘there’, being compliant to others and the lesson and completing tasks as and when they decide to, possibly prompted by eye contact with you or your proximity to them.
(2) INVOLVED: Those who are following the path of least resistance, making you aware that they are there by answering the first and / or lowest challenge, ‘quick win’ questions but not taking their own thinking further or developing it beyond the initial stages. They don’t pose their own questions and certainly don’t take up the challenge of driving their own (or others’) learning on.
(3) ENGAGED: BINGO! These are the students who question, consider, pose, test and really grapple with their own learning. They clarify their understanding through further questions to you and their peers and uses phrases like ‘I had a go at this…what do you think?’ These students demonstrate a real sense of AGENCY.
This approach can also be assessed and, more powerfully, peer and self assessed through powerful learning conversations that might begin with…
- What do you think is the difference between (a) PARTICIPATING (b) BEING INVOLVED (c) BEING ENGAGED?
- How ENGAGED (a) Do you EXPECT to be today (b) Did you EXPECT to be today?
- What does ‘being engaged’ look, sound and feel like for (a) you (b) your peers/ learning buddy?
- How do you need to change your EXPECTATIONS of yourself SO THAT you can move up the mountain of ENGAGEMENT?
Here’s a familiar (to those of you who know me well) visual prompt that you might want to adapt to support such questions with your groups…
“Ask not what you EXPECT of me, but what you EXPECT of yourself”…or something like that! Improved suggestions on a postcard, please…
Please let me know how you get on with this MLG. Unpicking EXPECTATIONS is a critical component of the MLG project and one MLG that has massive potential when it comes to aggregating the MLGs.