This Marginal Learning Gain is probably one of the purest as it really is tiny…but with big effect. Frequently, quality learning and thinking opportunities are missed when students’ misconceptions are overlooked or not recognised. The drive to ‘get things covered’ can often very understandably be overwhelming but with this, we may find that we miss some fabulous opportunities for our learners to delve deeper, address frequently occurring misconceptions or simply enhance the feedback we get from learners that can directly inform our immediate next (teaching) steps.
Often, a clarification question will have the sole purpose to check that students are on the right track, give us information as to who’s ‘got it’ and thereby give us the cue to move on. But in doing so, there is a chance that we miss out on valuable feedback to inform exactly what our next steps need to be to maximise the learning for all our students.
If, on the other hand, we adopt an Error-Seeking mindset, if only for a specific amount of time during the lesson, we can make a tiny change to the clarification question so that what we actually try to find out involves clarifying who is not on the right track and who hasn’t quite got it so that we can respond to whoever might need some additional, more probing questions to secure their understanding. At the same time, we can seize on misconceptions and inaccuracies as ‘critical learning moments’, as valuable diversions and delightful imaginative tangents.
So, it very simply comes down to asking NOT WHAT THEY DO UNDERSTAND but rather WHAT THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND. A tiny change in what we ask, look and listen for.
Becoming an Error-Seeker involves observing learning-as-it-happens so that we can use all that we see and hear to inform how we frame questions to students so that their thinking continues and deepens. This may be a mindset that you adopt for a specific period of time (very much part of the MLG method see here).
- “Who’s got it?”
- “Is everybody clear with this?”
- “Who thinks they have the right answer to this?”
- “Is everybody clear on what they have to do?”
- “What made it work?”
- “Who hasn’t quite grasped this yet?”
- “Who is nearly stuck?”
- “Who thinks they’re in danger of coming to a complete halt any minute now?”
- “Who is not clear on the first thing that they need to do now?”
- “What prevented this from working?”
As always, when Error-Seeking questions are asked, the choice is still yours as to whether to jump in and offer your expertise or, alternatively, you can decide to hold back and respond to what you hear with additional questions. There really is no right or wrong answer to this; it’s a judgement call for you and will be entirely dependent on the group, what you expect them to achieve and the learning climate you feel you have already established.
By deliberately exploiting any insecurities in understanding and knowledge in a such a proactive way, we can go a long way to establish a safe learning environment where ‘failure’ and ‘mistakes’ are redefined as ‘critical learning moments’. In doing so, we ensure that there is a strong sense of AFFILIATION so that students experience a palpable sense of AGENCY over their own learning.
WD-40 Learning: The ideal environment for an error-seeker
One way to establish an environment where you can really use an Error-Seeking mindset is to design opportunities to regularly model ‘great mistakes’ where you invite students to explore what we actually mean by a ‘mistake’ in the first place. My favourite example of this is captured in what I have, for years, referred to as the ‘WD-40’ approach to learning.
The story goes that WD-40 is so-called because it took 39 failed attempts to devise a water displacement spray by Norm Larsen before it actually displaced water. Without the tenacity, determination and acquired learning throughout these 39 ‘failed’ attempts, we would not now have one of the most widely known and owned inventions. The Michael Jordan NIKE advert communicates a similar message, but I’ve always had a soft spot for the simplicity and easy-to-remember story of WD40 to illustrate the power of exploration and the value of the process of learning. Plus I always think of my Dad when I see or, more accurately, smell WD-40 as it was a key feature of his shed and tool box when I was growing up.
So a WD-40 lesson or learning environment is characterised by high levels of engagement by students and teachers alike in the process of exploration, the grappling with difficulty and the experience of struggle. The teacher in a WD-40 lesson actively encourages speculation, idea-generation and reflective thinking focused on:
- Highlighting mistakes that need to be overcome and expecting students to suggest their own solutions
- Establishing a climate for learning that makes it okay to present and share unfinished, drafted or ‘initial attempts’ and expecting students to suggest their own next steps
- Encouraging students to highlight the areas of their learning have not been so successful and proposing their own refinements to improve
At the core of a WD-40 lesson is the teacher-mindset of The Error Seeker as such, you will notice that this Marginal Learning Gain is closely related to the MLG of Expectation
Gathering Learning Intelligence
One huge benefit of adopting the error-seeking mindset is that you can very efficiently gather learning intelligence to inform your immediate next steps. Observing learning techniques are fabulous activities for developing an Error-Seeking mindset as part of a WD-40 learning zone. In this way, you can avoid missing a critical learning opportunity when a student repeats a commonly-held misconception or frequently-made mistake. You can seize that moment and spend some time un-packing it to save time and energy further down the track when you find yourself correcting the same repeated mistake in a pile of Year 9 books, products or performances.
So an error seeking lesson is one where…
- The teacher readily and easily adapts their teaching to meet the learning needs presented to them as they happen
- The teacher stands back and observes learning as it happens, documenting learning and using this to inform the lesson design at hand and in the immediate future
- Learners make good progress, learning from their mistakes and constructing their own solutions to overcome difficulties
- The climate for learning actively encourages mistake-making as an integral part of the learning process and uses these as critical learning (teaching) moments
- Learners develop a strong sense of self-determination and agency so that they can make their own decisions and solutions to challenging tasks
- Teaching is matched to learner (a) needs and (b) potential because the learner-teacher feedback channel is always open and well amplified
- You can introduce the FAQ board where students post their confusions, questions and ‘stuck’ moments and other students (including those from other year groups) can post their suggestions for solutions, strategies to get un-stuck and clarifications. If you haven’t got space free in your room, it might be an opportunity for a departmental FAQ board divided into topics, themes and a place where ALL students can help each other. Teachers can then monitor the board and identify common themes and misconceptions that run through a year group.
ALSO check out HINGE QUESTIONS as a route to ERROR SEEKING from @Learningspy.
5 thoughts on “Error Seeking”
Hi Zoe – great reading.
I’d suggest that hinge questions are are a very powerful error seeking tool – more on how they work here: http://learningspy.co.uk/2012/02/04/how-effective-learning-hinges-on-good-questioning/
Thank you, David. I’ll add that as a link. Many thanks for taking the time to read and comment.
Reblogged this on Excellence & Growth Schools Network.